The Great Educator: How the Future Will Look With the Help of Science and Engineering, By Steve Huffman, The New Yorker

The future of education is increasingly dependent on technology.

It’s going to be very difficult to keep it that way if the technology itself is not up to par.

If you look at what’s happening with technology and what’s coming out of academia, it’s really driven by people with expertise in a particular field.

You have a bunch of people in a field that has some kind of a technology advantage that can help them solve problems.

That’s what’s happened with STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) in recent years, with some really powerful breakthroughs.

They’ve brought technology out of the lab and into the classroom.

But you don’t have the same kind of support in the classroom as you would in the lab.

So the education system has to take on a more collaborative role.

So one of the things I think is happening in STEM is that students and educators are beginning to realize that the field they’re in is really important.

They want to know how to get better at their craft.

And the best way to do that is by learning how to solve problems from scratch.

If they learn from the best, the smartest, and the best at solving problems, they’ll do better in the future.

And that’s exactly what you want in education.

So if you have someone who has the technical know-how and the ability to do great work in a certain field, then it’s a good idea to invest in that person.

It’ll make them more successful in the long run.

But I think you also need people with a background in a discipline that’s just as important, and that’s what STEM is.

And in particular, we’ve seen that with the field of physics, which is the most basic kind of physics.

You can build a spaceship in the backyard of your parents.

And so if you can build an object that’s the size of a postage stamp that you can fly, then that’s a really important achievement in science.

But if you’re a physicist, you can’t even make a spaceship.

That takes a whole lot of physics expertise.

The same is true of the field that’s really important for the future of the Internet.

If people in that field have an understanding of how to build a network, then they’ll have a much better chance of having the Internet that they want.

And you need that expertise to do the real work that the Internet needs to do.

So I think it’s just one of those things that’s going from being a very basic thing to becoming an increasingly important part of the economy, in part because of advances in technology.

We’ve got so much data about how to do things that people can do that they just have to learn it.

And there’s a lot of people who can do it and so they’re just better able to learn.

The other important thing is that people who have these kinds of expertise and who are willing to learn are better able and more motivated to do research.

The fact that they’re willing to work on these things has a big impact on the quality of what gets done.

And if people have those kinds of skills, and they’re motivated to learn, then the result is really great.

And I think that’s where we’re seeing this.

There’s a whole suite of areas where people who want to learn in science and engineering have these skills, like physics and astrophysics.

And people who do research in these fields are much better able, they’re much more motivated, and are better prepared for the work that they have to do than people who don’t.

So, as the future is going to look like, you’ve got to have people who are going to do science and engineers and scientists, so you have a lot more people doing those things.

So it’s going, it really is, a very complex situation.

And we’re going to need to be better at it.

But it’s an interesting question.